Well, as of sometime last year (?) I started this particular blog/website. I am now out of GB space. The free WordPress plan allows for 3 GB of storage space as you free planners know. 😉
I am 93.3% out of those 3 GB. Bad news. Ugh. So what am I going to do? I will probably have to buy a plan to keep this going. But if I do so, I will be upgrading other things as well. This means I’ll get my own .com domain name and…I’ll be able to dump adds! Yayyyyy!
The other thing I’ll have access to is tons more themes and some design customization I wasn’t privy to before. 😀
That will be nice.
Only one problem. I’m technically pretty broke. So that brings me to part two of this announcement.
Hiatus of Necessity
You probably saw this coming. I have no storage space…so I won’t be posting. Easy enough. I really am very uncertain as to when I’ll be able to upgrade my plan. I want to do some research and find someone who’s snazzy at design to help me with the design of my future website. 😉
Also, of I’m going to do this…I’m going all the way. I’ve never had to pay for my websites so I am going to figure out the most effective way to do this. I might just wait a while until I’m graduated and ready to start up a business at home. That might be sometime next year…
Basically—I will disappear from this blog unless I decide to do a post with just writing in it to update you. ❤
I think it’s time for another experiment post. Today I will be photographing a few subjects switching between two canon lenses: f/1.8 50mm, and the f/3.5 75-300mm.
This will be fun 😉 . Firstly, I am going to show the big lens at it’s most common focal lengths at the aperture f/4.5. Then I will use the 50mm at the same aperture. After that I will show a photo of the 50mm using f/1.8.
The second part of the post will be some photos I took recently on both lenses. 🙂
50mm & 75-300mm~ mason jar
Click on any of the images in the thumbnail grid to view my basic camera settings.
This grids images are the 75-300mm lens’s photos at it’s different major focal lengths. 😀
The first image is my 50mm lens’s photo of the mason jar at f/4.5. The second is the 50mm at f/1.8.
50mm & 75-300mm~ zinnia
This is the shots from the 75-300mm (I was wrong about staying at an aperture of 4.0. I actually changed it a little more to maintain proper exposure while zooming in . 😉
Once again the 50mm was set at 4.5 and 1.8. If you click on them you’ll be able to tell which is which.
50mm & 75-300mm~car
Catch Up Photos
important announcement! As of today I am almost out of storage space! I will probably not be posting here for a little while after today. I will explain in another post what this means more fully.
Today I was determined to stretch my photographic muscles so I went out to our yard equipped only with my kit lens…
The truth of the matter is this: I almost NEVER want to use my kit lens now that I have my 50mm 1.8.
Your kit lens is an old friend
My kit lens is the lens I first had. I couldn’t afford to buy another. It was the lens I chose to use even over the zoom lens that came along in the pack. One thing I was always frustrated with my kit lens over…was it’s adamant refusal to go above f/4.0 almost all the time. The smallest # I was gonna’ get—was f/3.5. And that only showed up on manual mode in rare conditions. So the blurring of my backgrounds in portraits was mediocre at best. But with some practice you tend to learn a few things. I was determined to use those tricks in today’s nature walk and really get my creative juices going with my kit lens.
I made new discoveries with my kit lens.
2. I learned to accept limitations and overcome them, even in portraits.
But the point is limiting yourself can be one of the greatest ways to overcome obstacles and get better.
Limiting myself with my old lens
So out I went with just my kit lens for two reasons:
I want to get better.
Limiting myself teaches me patience and creativity.
If you’re still stuck with your kit lens…appreciate it! It’s tough when you see friends of yours or other people with nicer lenses (who get that lovely bokeh so easily, while you have to work hard to get it!) and cameras. I remember always looking enviously at close friends who had nice cameras and wondering if my turn to get one would ever come. Sometimes God opens doors when we least expect then. So don’t worry. Save up to buy that lens (or camera)– but in the meantime work hard to get that bokeh, work your hardest to get a shallow depth of field in your portraits. It’s possible. Just difficult. But when you practice it can become much easier. (I’m still practicing–haven’t hit ‘perfection’ yet 😉 )
I was very surprised and pleased at the pictures I ended up getting. :blush:
Old limitations…what’s next?
I have something of a history with limitations. First, the fact that I had no camera. Then the fact I used my sister’s (not-so-great) point-and-shoot. Then the fact I (finally!) got my Canon Eos Rebel t6. Then I only had my kit lens. And then last year sometime a dear friend gave me my 50mm. THAT was a wonderful day. Everything has just been going to new levels since then.
One super neat thing–because I have been learning new things every day with my camera…now when I pick up my kit lens it’s not quite as hard to get pleasing images. As the photographer, it’s up to you to make your images great. Don’t just rely on your camera to automatically know how to be a good photographer. Your camera (lens, etc) isn’t the photographer. You are!
So, now what?
I have a plan for the next four years of my photography. It’s not a complete plan—but it is a purchasing plan.
I have decided on the next two lenses that I will buy.
Left: The canon 85mm f/1.8 prime lens! Right: The ef-s canon 35mmf/2.8 macro IS-STM (prime)
Aren’t they gorgeous? They both run in the somewhere below $400 range which isn’t the $1,000 range…so I’m happy. But this will still take 2-3 years of saving I’m guessing. I’ve wanted a macro lens for a while and this one looks like the perfect fit for me. It even has an lcd light to help me see close up. It has a clear focusing rate of 5.16 inches (means I can get that close to the subject!!) which sounds amazing to me. The 85mm looks like an amazing addition to the portrait side of things and a great idea to expand for my future business (next 2-4 years, DV.). I want to possibly get into more newborn photography and I’v always wanted to take close-up macro shots of things like baby toes, fingers, engagement rings, etc. I can’t wait. But basically I’m going to set up a budget and hopefully get a job to go toward investing in my photography business.
Who knows what the future will bring? But this girl’s looking forward to seeing what it brings for sure! *thumbs up
In what ways are you limited as a photographer?
Do you have any tips/experiences you’d like to share?
What are your goals for the future on the photography side of things?
Crushing on any lenses? (drooling, dreaming, etc. 😀 )
P.S USING AN OLD LENS OR LIMITING YOURSELF BY TAKING ONLY HORIZONTAL/VERTICAL SHOTS FOR A DAY IS A GREAT PHOTOGRAPHY EXERCISE. LOOK FOR CREATIVE WAYS TO LIMIT YOURSELF.
For some people the idea of shooting in broad daylight is daunting. Portraits especially can be scary. I was one of those people until around…yesterday. 😀
Angles are Everything
When the sun is hot and the light is harsh, a good angle could save the day. I was outside the other day and looking for inspiration. I haven’t done much shooting in broad daylight for the simple reason that it was hot and not overly ideal for portraits. But nature shots actually work fabulously outside even in the heat of the day. It turns out an angle can save a sunlight portrait too.
But to continue my tale of revelation I kept walking around and looked for an ideal spot. In our yard we have a side yard which is overgrown. Looks like a veritable jungle. But…I notice something I hadn’t noticed before. In the jungle there are TONS of queen anne’s lace. It is really the best field thingy ever for photography (expect some portraits there sometime).
Well…on angles. After messing around extensively and trying to position myself in a way favorable to sun- I had an idea. Why not try to catch the clear blue sky with the queen anne’s lace?
One thing I love about these images is that they fit my tagline to a T (‘Neutrals with a Pop of Color’). Oh, random question? Have you seen my website look for here yet?
Underexposure and Your Light Meter
Another thing that I think is actually neat–is how your light meter is tempted to underexpose your images. This light is so bright, that the meter thinks it needs to help out and compensate for the brightness. So it underexposes. This can be anything from underexposing your subject to underexposing the background. But you can actually twist this annoyance in your favor.
This picture is interesting because I have the sun at the top left of the frame and a tree which was lit the same at the lower. The meter underexposed by the subject and overexposed at the top. But I like this photo. Once again, I think it created a neat effect and I’m glad as usual that I used my manual mode (that’s what I use 90% of the time unless I use AV or TV).
Random Pictures from the Shoot
Extension Tube Review
An extension tube pretty much just extends your lens so that you can take closer up pictures. A friend is letting me borrow one and I LOVE IT. I was looking them up and they’re not bad on the price side. Much better than getting an $1000 macro lens (yes, I know the macro lens is better–but my pocket book won’t budge.). So much easier on the wallet.
I think it’s a good idea to purchase one, especially if you can’t get very close up to things. They’re a little bit trickier to navigate than an actual lens but I think it’s worth it on the whole.
Here’s what they look like…
Bonus picture: screenshot of chromatic aberrations fix…
On the fourth of July…our family generally goes to a party for our church held at a friend’s house.
I don’t know about you…but for me the 4th isn’t the 4th. WHATT?? 😆
UNLESS…you have fireworks, that is 😀 .
I have a lot of memories from previous 4th of July’s. One (not-so-great) memory that concerns the gal in the selfie with me…is also concerning fireworks. You see, we used to be allowed to bring fireworks to the party and shoot them off during. But people were being irresponsible and unsafe and my friend was at the bad receiving end. She got hit in the face with some of the flying debris of a rocket firework. 😯 Don’t worry though…she was okay after a while.
Moral? Stay safe y’all. Always act responsibly. Your carelessness could hurt someone else.
That said I ❤ LOVE ❤ fireworks! Loud noises don’t bother me and I love taking pictures. This is the 1st 4th of July that I’ve had a dslr to mess with.
So where do I watch fireworks if I don’t do it at the party? At home. Everyone else goes to a fireworks show. But that’s not something my family has ever done. Don’t know why. This year my sis wasn’t with us so we went back and did our own fireworks.
For me the 4th of July is a time where I photography anything in my path (isn’t that everyday, Emma?Uh…yeah. I guess it is. ). Nature, fireworks, food, people, etc.
I did notice that you can get much closer up with a wide angle lens. Just in case you were wondering…I DO know that wide angle lenses are mostly used in landscapes. But there weren’t many landscapes to talk of at the party so…yep.
Anyways I had a good 4th of July. I hope you did, too. I do think I haven’t gotten the hang of fireworks pictures. My ISO was too high for my taste and my shutter speed was too low. 😥
How was your fourth?
Did anyone say ‘may the 4th be with you’, to you? (I think it’s annoying!)
In my mind…timing is everything. It pertains to the lighting, the expression of the models face, and the mood. If you time something incorrectly, you might miss a special moment.
What Time is Nicest?
This is honestly a matter of personal preference. I would say golden hour (there are two!), and for me the last one. I have been awake (for the first golden hour) approximately one first golden hour and it was before I got my camera 😥 . But find what works best for you. I know of people who’s favorite time based on lighting to photograph is twilight.
But now some photos I recently took during golden hour…including the white dress 😀 .
Check Before You Snap!
I am awful, terrible, dreadful- when it comes to following this. I am always forgetting to check and see if something distracting is in my frame. I forget to take another look at the expressions on my models’ faces. And I also forget to check my settings. One shift can change your exposure. And especially during the golden hour! For instance…I think that where I live I have less time in the golden hour. This is not because my golden hour isn’t an hour. It’s because our property only gets the lovely light as long as I can follow it.
This means I’m constantly getting my subjects to move for me.
“Oh, the light’s moved again! Can we move this way a little? Maybe stand right there…uh…not there. There! Much better!”
So if you’re in a rush…the goal is to make sure your pictures don’t look rushed. Stay calm and check the settings before you press the shutter.
check to make sure the model’s hands aren’t placed stiffly.
check your exposure on the meter.
check to make sure the model is standing straight, but not stiffly (if they’re standing).
check the background.
access the negative space in your image.
Once again, the timing is everything!
Here’re a few more pictures before I close out this post.
This post has been long in the coming. It’s a topic of some dispute in the photography community. There are people who hold to absolutely NO editing, people who hold to a crazy Photoshop approach (making the image look almost nothing like the original), and people who hold to editing to enhance the already-there quality of the image. These people tend to stick healthily in the middle–and have their own unique style of editing (but not crazy or they end up in the huge Photoshop category).
I fall into the last category…and in this post I will do my best to explain why.
Editing to Enhance
In my own mind…I dislike editing that completely changes an image. For instance I don’t like removing moles or freckles. Those are character adding. But blemishes–I think removing them is a good idea.
I edit to enhance what’s already in the image. Take this image here…(yes I realize I use this one all the time).
So when I edit I try my best to enhance what’s already there. If it’s just a bad picture then that’s my fault. I’m not going to beautify a picture that isn’t beautiful. That in my mind, is just laziness. If there’s no quality–it goes in the trash bin; not my editing platform. But if the image has great potential (focus is on point, lighting and composition are good.) then I will edit to enhance.
Jpeg User of Necessity
I shoot in jpeg for those of you wondering. My simple reason for that is my editing platform doesn’t do a good job editing RAW…and I have had a hard time actually converting them BACK to jpeg for internet sharing.
RAW is another way of shooting on camera. It saves information that jpeg loses. The drawback is that the information makes the image coming out somewhat bland. So you have to edit it back into the image. That’s actually not a bad thing…because RAW images have so much information when they’re fixed–they can be stunning! Jpeg chooses what information is saved in your image. But if you’re using something like light room shooting and converting in RAW is a good idea.
The big difference?
Jpeg processes the picture on your camera for you RAW allows you to process the pictures.
I think in one of my earliest posts I said something about how I want to edit as little as possible to preserve what’s already there. I still agree with that statement. But at some point I realized that not everything can be done right on your camera and still look like a photographer. While I believe that a photographer should actually prove they know how to be one by strong composition, lighting, and focus– I think that a little less than half of photography is editing. Here’s an image I found before and after.
In some ways…I think it boils down to this. Are you planning on becoming a payed photographer? Or are you just everyone’s go to person to snap a photo and preserve a memory? If you’re planning on becoming a photographer…you should consider editing seriously. It’s fine if you want to be a natural light photographer (they still edit!) and if you want the quality of your image to shine through. You can still do that! Just don’t get into presets and filters and do stick to basic edits for lighting and blemish removal.
What’s YOUR Style?
I am going to do something new! I am gonna’ take you through my editing process on an image I took today. I promise the before photo will be the straight-off-the-camera photo. I am going to use screenshots so…yeah. Sorry. That’s the only way I can show you at the moment. I am literally editing this RIGHT NOW as I’m typing this post. So here’s my image:
Here’s what you need to know. This image was shot in overcast weather (today) and I used a picture style setting which increased saturation by 1 and increased sharpening by 3. This is on manual mode…so it’s not cheating 😉 . It’s just part of my style for nature shots. Keep in mind that my style for portraits is different. Also bear in mind that different lighting conditions will influence the choices I make for editing.
Fix the white balance!
2. Fix chromatic aberrations around the flower by removing magenta and purple from the photos on the color slider.
3. Exposure Fix.
Black level- +23
And that’s it! Here is the before after for you…
You can see my style is a slightly warmer edit overall. This is a pretty recent development which I described in my post I Was Doing It Wrong!
For portraits I like warmer too…but my editing process is different. The reason I chose to edit this image vs. trash it…is because I saw potential in it. I like overcast lighting, and was pleased with the focus. Even the exposure wasn’t bad. I also like the other Queen Anne’s Lace in the background+ I love the blur. So that was a keeper in my mind.
For new people this may still seem like a lot of editing. I understand. I went through the no-edit phase. I was shocked when I saw stuff on pinterest which showed me the unedited work of photographers I looked up to and realized…half of the image was editing!
That’s not to say that the on camera quality isn’t as important. I think it’s the #1 priority. I don’t wanna take awful pictures and then make them look good on an editor! Yuck. But I have noticed that as I learn photography my style and composition and all-around skills–just get better! So don’t get discouraged if your photos don’t look like the pros right off. You will become a better photographer as you practice…and will learn so much more. Oh, and just so you know–the pros’ photos don’t look like the pros’ photos right away either! They edit them too. But the pros are also a lot better photographers as well. A whole lot better than I am.
Do you edit your photos?
How much do you as a photographer (or how little) do you edit your photos?